[deputy963]

How trying to *read*.... it's soooo simple *open* DC and click *help* and *read*... might be of some assistance. I can point you in the direction. It's you that needs to get there.... remember with most software, the *keyword* is *help* oh and reading. :banned

Thanks for the informative pointers to ease the steep learning curve :ar

 

[TheWraith]

Some software is a timebomb. you attempt to crack it it goes poof and yer comp is dedmeat.

I've seen you state completely unsubstantiated remarks on several occassions. Just this once, point us to a piece of software that elicits this behavior you describe. Cite your source(s). I'm interested in seeing what software supposedly "poofs yer comp" when cracked. Save me the trouble of Snopes'ing it before hand so I don't have to. I'm entertained to read your posts everytime you say, "spoofing proggy". I'm not sure if you're eluding to IP spoofing or merely HTTP proxy environments, but it's technologically comical to watch you talk of it, none the less.

Microsoft has touted trusted computing for much longer than Longhorn has been on the wire.

I can assure you they will or already have a tiny little cookie implanted on your os telling them everything they want to know about you and your comp... Did you know that the government spooks have the trchnology to watch you from your monitor on a connected comp? It isn't any hi res shit but I wouldn't reccomend doing any illegal activity in front of a connected comp.......

Your technology conspiracy theories are mildly amusing. I hate to burst your bubble, but your little rumor is most certainly just that. Video monitors do not possess the abilities you describe. To believe otherwise is an excercise in complete idiocy. Do you look over your shoulder and the mysterious black helicopters you claim are watching you, too?

I ain't paranoid. I am just stating the facts...

No. You're doing what you always do in spewing forth unsubstanciated garbage, continually. I'll bet you even forward chain letters. You're not stating facts, you're stating these little theories of yours; that you've conjured out of your own dilusions, heard someone talk about who heard from someone that someone said something...or otherwise are the main follower of Internet rumors.

Thats why banks and other institutions use 128bit encryption.

No we don't. 128 doesn't meet regulatory requirements. Not that you'd know that or have any experience or knowledge about that. But, that is simply the norm for you; talking about things you've absolutely no clue about.

It aint been broken yet.

Yes it has. Long ago.

Its mathematically impossible or dam near to do....

No it isn't. But, damn funny watching you talk about it as if it were. It's called, "Clue", you need one.

and every one is generated string of random characters and numbers written to the file and only made for YOUR comp and YOUR comp only.

I find it amusing you think encryption algorithms are based in randomness. Very cute. You'll excuse me if I don't seem interested in listening to your uneducated ramblings on encryption hashing; one-way or otherwise.

I'm only the messenger not the evil one.

The only problem is that your message is full of inaccuracies and based largly in your own ignorance in the face of attempting to appear knowledgable of which you speak. I find your ramblings technically amusing.

Thank you.

 

[Krazy Hawaiian]

Your problem Mr. knowitall is you are a jackass looking to start trouble. :banned

 

[TheWraith]

And your's is that nearly everything you say is grossly inaccurate or otherwise unfounded falsehoods.

 

[Wreckless]

Look at this wonderful thread... and me without my popcorn smiley!! How embarassing! I feel so naked without it!!!!

Insert popcorn smiley Here X ................... Here X................... and Here X.......................... Heck why not here too X....

 

[fierospeeder]

you can crack 128 bit


and my buddys an electrical engineer and he would know if he puts cameras inside computer montiors.

 

[O.W. Kenobi]

I've seen you state completely unsubstantiated remarks on several occassions. Just this once, point us to a piece of software that elicits this behavior you describe. Cite your source(s). I'm interested in seeing what software supposedly "poofs yer comp" when cracked. Save me the trouble of Snopes'ing it before hand so I don't have to. I'm entertained to read your posts everytime you say, "spoofing proggy". I'm not sure if you're eluding to IP spoofing or merely HTTP proxy environments, but it's technologically comical to watch you talk of it, none the less.

Microsoft has touted trusted computing for much longer than Longhorn has been on the wire.



Your technology conspiracy theories are mildly amusing. I hate to burst your bubble, but your little rumor is most certainly just that. Video monitors do not possess the abilities you describe. To believe otherwise is an excercise in complete idiocy. Do you look over your shoulder and the mysterious black helicopters you claim are watching you, too?



No. You're doing what you always do in spewing forth unsubstanciated garbage, continually. I'll bet you even forward chain letters. You're not stating facts, you're stating these little theories of yours; that you've conjured out of your own dilusions, heard someone talk about who heard from someone that someone said something...or otherwise are the main follower of Internet rumors.



No we don't. 128 doesn't meet regulatory requirements. Not that you'd know that or have any experience or knowledge about that. But, that is simply the norm for you; talking about things you've absolutely no clue about.



Yes it has. Long ago.



No it isn't. But, damn funny watching you talk about it as if it were. It's called, "Clue", you need one.



I find it amusing you think encryption algorithms are based in randomness. Very cute. You'll excuse me if I don't seem interested in listening to your uneducated ramblings on encryption hashing; one-way or otherwise.



The only problem is that your message is full of inaccuracies and based largly in your own ignorance in the face of attempting to appear knowledgable of which you speak. I find your ramblings technically amusing.

Thank you.

Let's take a small timeout. Here's a small vacation to clear your head and learn to play nice:

 

[Wreckless]

Ouch...... yet another happy camper.... (banned camp) ...

 

[L8 Braker]

Ouch...... yet another happy camper.... (banned camp) ...

I love this smilie, just wish it was b*****...

:banned

 

[brentsR6]

bah too late, but oh well:

 

[Krazy Hawaiian]

Thank You O.W. Kenobi Much appreciated Sir!

 

[fierospeeder]

wraith, you were banned for three days. Just letting you know because you prob cant see the image.

 

[Krazy Hawaiian]

I love this smilie, just wish it was b*****...

:banned

This better?

 

[BuRn__]

Heh... open source, Ain't gonna be that way for long. There's a movement underway to change that.

there has always been a movement...its called Microsoft. Linux was created as open source OS comparible to Windows. The OS software is always going to be free, the only thing they're adding is the option for tech support. RedHat recently did this with their new OS for corporations. There's different value OS's u can buy. (they're all the same however). what you pay for is the length of tech support you wish to have. so if ur a home user and dont care about tech support...linux will ALWAYS be free and open.

look up Fedora Core 2. (pretty sure core 2 was released). i ran Fedora Core 1 on my laptop for several months contributing to the debugging process. The community that backs JUST THIS version of linux is not going to let it be closed source anytime soon. Even if that does happen, guess what...a new OS would have just been introduced that again, is open source.

 

[Krazy Hawaiian]

Lemme think... why on earth would the open source movement be offering people "money" to use alternative OS'es if they wernt planning somnething??? By alternative that means winhoes or similar, not linux.

You can read all about it on doom9.org I don't spew garbage like some do mine is always backed by fact. You need to update your files a wee bit.

 

[scorpion12]

You know, it's not just DRM that does this...

Sony's newest offering to try to kill the iPod does something similar... they import your mp3's into their proprietary format Atrac3... don't know if they make for unconverting files from Atrac3...

link:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/01/sony_hd_walkman/

 

[BuRn__]

Lemme think... why on earth would the open source movement be offering people "money" to use alternative OS'es if they wernt planning somnething??? By alternative that means winhoes or similar, not linux.

where on earth did u read that? that does not go along with anything i wrote...did u even read the post?
ur serioulsy dwindled in 'conspiracy theories' that have no factual backups

 

[fierospeeder]

anyone a programmer on here?


+1 with what burn said.

 

[Krazy Hawaiian]

All you need to do is "READ" it's a huge topic up about it at Doom9. Where I get most of my info from, I don't spew garbage out like most of the chimps. If you hear it from me you can be sure it's from some reputable source. I love to read and do alot of it.

www.doom9.org you might want to read up a little bit before you begin ranting and end up :banned :banned :banned :banned

 

[BuRn__]

All you need to do is "READ" it's a huge topic up about it at Doom9. Where I get most of my info from, I don't spew garbage out like most of the chimps. If you hear it from me you can be sure it's from some reputable source. I love to read and do alot of it.

www.doom9.org you might want to read up a little bit before you begin ranting and end up :banned :banned :banned :banned

lol, so u believe everything you read online? i dunno about u, but experience leads me to believe things...not what some nobodys posts on a website. So it seems reputable to you, big whoop. so u "spew" it to the rest of us claiming its reputable? why? cuz u said it is? please.

and for every1 that has challenged ur "factual information", you respond with the banned smiley...why is that? just cuz we're refuting you, we should be banned? why? cuz ur arguments are filled with falsities?