Another Palin smear bites the dust - Page 4

jim schmidt · 09-07-2008, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by F&D

The link to The Smoking Gun has a copy of the document Scott Richter filed to request his divorce records be sealed, for reasons of wanting to protect his family's privacy.

TSG asserts that they went through the entire 98-page divorce document and the Palins were not mentioned in it at all other than in this sealing request. No mention of an affair.

Now, I have not seen Mr. Richter's full divorce document on the web anywhere, but IMO this is entirely appropriate. It may not have been sealed, but nobody deserved to have such a private matter splashed all over the internet either.

If this is a lie, it would be VERY easy to prove, no? There either is mention of an affair with Sarah Palin in it, or there isn't. There is not.

I just love the double-standard of proof you apply. Since when have you ever required this degree of substantive proof for an allegation that supports with your agenda?

Well nothing you've written here actually proves the assertions in the blog, but you've actually gone a long way toward using The Smoking Gun as a source. Since you didn't -- and since it seems to be a much better choice -- I'm assuming this is post-use research right?

This is exactly the kind of vetting you ought to be doing prior to subjecting us to some random blog. Still, it seems well short of the claim that

Quote:

Another Palin smear bites the dust

Here's your actual headline: "No mention of Palin in Divorce Filing?"

You have to begin to believe that truth matters.

636blurr · 09-07-2008, 10:20 AM

Why R you guys catering to jim, make him for once prove that its not. he hasnt, but you keep doing what he wants, why?

The Central Scrutinizer · 09-07-2008, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 636blurr

Why R you guys catering to jim, make him for once prove that its not. he hasnt, but you keep doing what he wants, why?

"catering"? WTF? And while I'm at it, what's with this "you guys" that you, F&D, and that idiot Dickota are always throwing around?

Blurr, you know I don't side with anyone here. I generally take my own stand and I'll argue with anybody I disagree with, lefty or righty. But when somebody is right, they're right. In fact I've even agreed with you on a thing or two. Jim and I have had our little squabbles, but in reality our politics aren't that much different. Just our personalities.

Your politics are the frikkin' complete opposite of mine, so if I agree with Jim or anyone else, why does that make it "you guys"?

Just relate to people on a one-on-one basis, dude.

county · 09-07-2008, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 636blurr

Why R you guys catering to jim, make him for once prove that its not. he hasnt, but you keep doing what he wants, why?

Well, he's our leader. Much like Moses, (Or Joseph Smith) he led us from the wilderness (STN) to the promised land (SBN).

Most of us have a statute of Jim on a little altar on top of our screens. The rest wear a little crucifix like amulet with a small caricature of Jim nailed to a computer screen.

Hope that clears it up for you.

636blurr · 09-07-2008, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by county

Well, he's our leader. Much like Moses, (Or Joseph Smith) he led us from the wilderness (STN) to the promised land (SBN).

Most of us have a statute of Jim on a little altar on top of our screens. The rest wear a little crucifix like amulet with a small caricature of Jim nailed to a computer screen.

Hope that clears it up for you.

funny shit.