al Maliki agrees... - Page 3

SXSMITH · 07-09-2008, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gfarce

Sorry, the wingnuts around here have no links to sources, even from their wingnut side of the political spectrum.

Yup. See my earlier post.

What's the difference between changing one's position and flip floping?

Dakota Kid · 07-09-2008, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer

So how many times do you have to go through this before it gets monotonous? What's the point in proving this BS over and over again? Do you really think there's anyone here that hasn't figured it out yet?

It's like playing an old video game so many times that you can beat it with your eyes closed. Enough already... just stick it in a corner and let it get moldy, huh?

I mean, SERIOUSLY...

Huh, still relagated to stirring up crap and trying to get people to ignore me, I see,

FAIL

The Central Scrutinizer · 07-09-2008, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaolee

Were you surprised with a straight face? If so, you have been converted to Seriousness (tm).

No danger of that. After decades of carelessness and rough treatment, my face is incapable of being straight.

It has been pummeled into a permagrin.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baldrick

Seems I'm back off ignorz, too, apparently...

Suprised?

I, too, am on 'false ignorz', it appears. How disappointing.

Q: How much trolling can a troll try, if the troll truly ignorz?

A: Only as much as the trollee allows himself to be trapped.

Tricked by a troll... trapped in a troll's transparent travesty. Treacherously trampled by transgression. Tragic, true?

Dakota Kid · 07-09-2008, 02:02 PM

Please do not procreate.

baldheadeddork · 07-09-2008, 09:42 PM

McCain goes from flip flop to delusion.

Quote:

Q: Senator, with Iraqi leaders now calling for a timetable for U.S. troop withdrawals–

McCAIN: Actually, the Iraqis are not. The Iraqis were widely reported as short a time ago as a couple of weeks ago that there would be no status of forces agreement, and Maliki would say that, and it got headlines, and of course it turned out not to be true.

mikem317 · 07-09-2008, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jim schmidt

Supposedly.

Speaking of the surge, I've noticed that McCain is now taking credit for it. They're calling it "John McCain's Surge." But wasn't that Patreaus' plan, based on his published writings? I think McCain plagiarized the surge. Maybe Patreaus should have trademarked it.

The Surge®

McCain advocated a "change" in strategy. I'll admit that it's a pretty nebulous claim, but it passes the sniff test. I'm not sure if the change in strategy was part of the surge or vice versa.

jim schmidt · 07-09-2008, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikem317

McCain advocated a "change" in strategy. I'll admit that it's a pretty nebulous claim, but it passes the sniff test. I'm not sure if the change in strategy was part of the surge or vice versa.

I guess my sniffer is calibrated differently than yours. If we use your measure, it's Ted Kennedy's Surge®too!