twin vs inline 4 - Page 3 - Sportbikes.net
General Sportbikes This area is for sport bike discussion in general. Topics that don't really belong anywhere else can go here. Questions can be answered and addressed to fully understand certain aspects of the sport. If your question is manufacturer specific please post it there.
Sponsored by: TCX Boots

User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #31 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 06:11 PM
Naked Bike Tourer
 
No Coast Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CT
Age: 28
Posts: 3,470
Thanks: 384
Thanked 792 Times in 470 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catog View Post
I have never ridden an I4. I own a twin. It is fun and has more torque than hp. It is a metric 800 and just about any bike out there will eat it up. It is a Suzuki vx800 and was designed to be an all around ride. My next bike will be a liter bike. I really want a twin liter bike but those are either expensive or hard to find. So I might settle for a 4 or a triple.

My bike is an 800 but it feels more like a 600. It puts out 60hp at the crank and at the wheel it is more like 40 because I'm at 7k feet. Well, it's a fun bike but its not very fast.

My thought on twins is that they are great for cruisers. That instant torque is good. I can put it in 5th at 25 mph and pull up to 90 pretty quickly. However I feel like a 4 will make more use of the torque and will be faster and of course that is true.


Sent from my iPhone using Motorcycle.com Free App
Look for an Aprilia RSVR or Tuono, equal to an RC51 but cheap. I got mine, an 08 with 5000 miles in July for 7k in great condition.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Motorcycle.com Free App

I always err on the side of awesome.
Touring on Inappropriate Equipment since 2008

58 Forever...
No Coast Rider is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 06:19 PM
500 G.P. Champion
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Western Austalia South Coast
Age: 40
Posts: 1,510
Thanks: 6
Thanked 108 Times in 81 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Coast Rider View Post
Look for an Aprilia RSVR or Tuono, equal to an RC51
I think you are insulting the Aprilia's with that statement , although if you want a proper grunty V twin get the first gen Aprilia's ie Millie's etc The latter RSVR's and the like are pretty limp wristed in the mid range.
Nero Diablo is offline  
post #33 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 07:28 PM
500 GP Racer
 
uncalcetindelana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Punta Arenas, Chile
Age: 28
Posts: 869
Thanks: 797
Thanked 258 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
A cheap twin (which I love) is the Honda VTR1000. The slightly more reasonable alternative to the RVT, you could say.

Superhawk or Firestorm, depending on where you look.

nico
uncalcetindelana is offline  
post #34 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 08:25 PM
500 GP Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Box Elder, SD WOOOOOOT!!
Posts: 848
Thanks: 95
Thanked 130 Times in 99 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero Diablo View Post
I think you are insulting the Aprilia's with that statement , although if you want a proper grunty V twin get the first gen Aprilia's ie Millie's etc The latter RSVR's and the like are pretty limp wristed in the mid range.

i was thinking the same thing... the mst expensive RC i've seen (when i was looking for one) was 5600. by my calculations, i believe that is lower than 7k. but hey, maybe obamanomics makes money count differently.

If you're gonna go, go with a smile!!
2012 ZX-14R in Blaze Green.
USAFgsxr750again is offline  
post #35 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 08:56 PM
Naked Bike Tourer
 
No Coast Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CT
Age: 28
Posts: 3,470
Thanks: 384
Thanked 792 Times in 470 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
 
Wow, even beat to shit RCs sell for a premium on CL here.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Motorcycle.com Free App

I always err on the side of awesome.
Touring on Inappropriate Equipment since 2008

58 Forever...
No Coast Rider is offline  
post #36 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 09:16 PM
SBN Newb
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: -
Age: 24
Posts: 27
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
RC51's in MD are up there in the $$$. I'd rather go with a TL1000R or S instead. similar quality, hp/tq for less money. mint TLR's are going for 4-5k and mint rc51's can go as high as 7k (was an 05).

Last edited by K7sixxer; 12-18-2012 at 09:20 PM.
K7sixxer is offline  
post #37 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-18-2012, 09:22 PM
After Me Lucky Charms
 
Shamrock627's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Age: 45
Posts: 5,176
Thanks: 868
Thanked 698 Times in 454 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
 
I guess you boys raggin on the RC51s should look at mssdrider's.

It makes an Aprilia look sick. Yes I said it.
Shamrock627 is offline  
post #38 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 10:01 AM
World 500 GP Racer
 
UltimateOG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Oceanside, CA
Age: 27
Posts: 2,886
Thanks: 467
Thanked 493 Times in 337 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
 
I don't know about all of you, but I am still waiting for Triumph to make a fully faired liter version of the D675. That or I am just going to have to say up for a "cheap" used Euro bike.

As much as i love my 636, the need to keep the bike in the mid-high revs constantly is getting old. Much older than I thought it would.

When Life Gets Hard, Play Harder.
UltimateOG is offline  
post #39 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 11:07 AM
World 500 GP Champion
 
arcticamt6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 27
Posts: 21,249
Thanks: 1,169
Thanked 2,419 Times in 1,351 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltimateOG View Post
I don't know about all of you, but I am still waiting for Triumph to make a fully faired liter version of the D675. That or I am just going to have to say up for a "cheap" used Euro bike.

As much as i love my 636, the need to keep the bike in the mid-high revs constantly is getting old. Much older than I thought it would.
There's not enough demand to justify the enormous development costs. For someone new to break into the liter supersport scene, you have to blow everyone else away, like the s1000rr did.


Sent from my iPhone using Motorcycle.com Free App
arcticamt6 is offline  
post #40 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 11:54 AM
SBN Newb
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: -
Age: 24
Posts: 27
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by arcticamt6 View Post
There's not enough demand to justify the enormous development costs. For someone new to break into the liter supersport scene, you have to blow everyone else away, like the s1000rr did.


Sent from my iPhone using Motorcycle.com Free App
speak for yourself, that is hands down one of the ugliest bikes i've ever seen. performance numbers are great (for 2 grand more than other liters, it better be) but that bike got hit with the ugly stick more than once as a child

I don't understand the hype at all, i'm sorry. they charge more, for more performance. what am I missing?

Last edited by K7sixxer; 12-19-2012 at 11:58 AM.
K7sixxer is offline  
post #41 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 12:08 PM
World 500 GP Champion
 
arcticamt6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 27
Posts: 21,249
Thanks: 1,169
Thanked 2,419 Times in 1,351 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidNightK7 View Post
speak for yourself, that is hands down one of the ugliest bikes i've ever seen. performance numbers are great (for 2 grand more than other liters, it better be) but that bike got hit with the ugly stick more than once as a child

I don't understand the hype at all, i'm sorry. they charge more, for more performance. what am I missing?
I think it's ugly too.

My point was that if you are a new manufacturer to the segment, you can't come out with a bike that is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, etc. most people will buy the proven designs that are better.

MV came out into the middleweight scene this year with the F3. Like the Triumph, it's a 675cc 3cyl bike. But, I haven't read a review that puts it ahead of the Triumph. And for that extra cost, and limited dealer network, 90%+ of people will go with the Triumph. I don't see the F3 lasting very long.


Sent from my iPhone using Motorcycle.com Free App
arcticamt6 is offline  
post #42 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 12:10 PM
500 GP Racer
 
uncalcetindelana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Punta Arenas, Chile
Age: 28
Posts: 869
Thanks: 797
Thanked 258 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidNightK7 View Post
speak for yourself, that is hands down one of the ugliest bikes i've ever seen. performance numbers are great (for 2 grand more than other liters, it better be) but that bike got hit with the ugly stick more than once as a child

I don't understand the hype at all, i'm sorry. they charge more, for more performance. what am I missing?
No, he's speaking for the market, the literbike segment.

It blew everyone else away in performance, precisely. No need to make any hype.
uncalcetindelana is offline  
post #43 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 12:12 PM
500 G.P. Champion
 
ANORXIC'51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Age: 33
Posts: 2,285
Thanks: 747
Thanked 303 Times in 206 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MidNightK7 View Post
speak for yourself, that is hands down one of the ugliest bikes i've ever seen. performance numbers are great (for 2 grand more than other liters, it better be) but that bike got hit with the ugly stick more than once as a child

I don't understand the hype at all, i'm sorry. they charge more, for more performance. what am I missing?
Ride one and you'll understand. I witnessed first hand what its traction control is capable of. Last session of the day at California Superbike School and it was raining. Got spooked by a puddle of standing water at my exit mark coming out of 7a into the esses and ran onto the painted curbing at the entrance to the essees. Rear wheel spun up, got just a tad sideways, and the bike corrected itself and sent me on my merry way as planned before I even had the chance to wrongly chop throttle and highside myself into oblivion.....which I'm positive I would've done since I'd never ridden a 190 hp bike in the rain before.

As far as the aesthetics....it's a hit or miss for most people, but a set of track plastics cures the issue people have with the asymmetrical headlights. Riding in street trim...well, the rider doesn't see them, and others won't ever mistake whats coming towards them/up from behind them.

Never stop learning.
ANORXIC'51 is offline  
post #44 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 01:20 PM
World 500 GP Champion
 
TCormier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 23
Posts: 6,885
Thanks: 245
Thanked 720 Times in 492 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I LOVE the S1000RR!!!! Think it is absolutely gorgeous bike.

That being said, if I had to choose for the street, I'd go with Twin. For the track, it really depends on what I'm wanting. I think a twin is just, in general, easier to ride (although I don't have a ton of experience on them). I'm similar to Anorxic in this instance, that I have a problem of staying in the correct gear on my 636. But when you do it is just like a damned rocketship! I'd probably stick with the I4 for the track for racing purposes, but a twin would definitely be my go to on the street. Only reason I have the FZ6 instead of a twin is because I felt more comfortable on it. And it is geared in a way that has a good bit of low end torque so I don't worry about that aspect of things

http://www.hazardousracing.com/
Thanks to Hazardous Racing for helping me get to the track!
TCormier is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TCormier For This Useful Post:
CBROldMan (12-19-2012), PhilB (12-20-2012)
post #45 of 98 (permalink) Old 12-19-2012, 03:14 PM
Banned
 
PCHbreeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 7,615
Thanks: 2,854
Thanked 919 Times in 675 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBROldMan View Post
( for street riding)

I know the simple answer is ride one and see for yourself, which I hope I get
the chance to do; but wondering how the acceration differences are at different speeds for the i4 vs a twin of almost the same cc.

Heard that the twins have more low end torque and the i4's have more high end torque, but how does this translate to actual riding?

The i4 will take off faster from 70 to 90+ where the twins will take off faster from the beginning, but not accelerate as fast at higher speeds?
Thats pretty much it. Everything else is just typical internet chatter and or details.

Ive went back and forth and feel like motorcycles are like women....as long as its fast loud and imported im happy. My only preference is that I want one of each.


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using Motorcycle.com Free App
PCHbreeze is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to PCHbreeze For This Useful Post:
CBROldMan (12-19-2012)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbikes.net forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
who went from inline to v4 or twin philhousley General Sportbikes 30 05-31-2003 11:32 PM
Twin or Inline outoforder General Sportbikes 17 07-17-2002 10:54 AM
Inline 4 vs. V-twin BikerJonTN General Sportbikes 12 10-29-2001 09:15 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome