Honda CBR500 is a reality - Page 3 - Sportbikes.net
General Sportbikes This area is for sport bike discussion in general. Topics that don't really belong anywhere else can go here. Questions can be answered and addressed to fully understand certain aspects of the sport. If your question is manufacturer specific please post it there.
Sponsored by: TCX Boots

User Tag List

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #31 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 01:12 AM
500 G.P. Champion
 
Furad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boise
Age: 35
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 83
Thanked 349 Times in 190 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidka View Post
Short of what? The Ninja makes 2-3 more hp waaay up top where very few will ever ride it. Below peak the CBR makes better usable power.

Cylinder count? I'm still betting that a US version will be at least as powerful.
Very few will ride high up in the rev range? Who do you know that doesn't dance around in the power band of any bike when their trying to have a good time? The CBR doesn't even have a power band up high because it's a thumper.

Watch this video of the CBR getting pulled on a race track from sheer power.

Furad is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 01:47 AM
Back Marker
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NJ
Age: 26
Posts: 59
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Those specs look pitiful. The 1997 Ninja 500 I learned on was about the same weight, but with more power and a top speed at least 10 mph higher. Maybe they engineered it with fuel economy in mind but the 50+ mpg I got on my Ninja was very satisfactory. Of course specs don't tell the whole story, but they are an important part of selling bikes, and personally I'm just not impressed.
Shamefister is offline  
post #33 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 06:02 AM
500 G.P. Champion
 
Tony216's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: I live in PA, and the voices live in my head.
Age: 42
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 210
Thanked 428 Times in 307 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOnASupersport View Post
They're killin' me with curiosity. I check back every so often to see what they've come up with but still no sportbikes. I think Kawi has everyone beat anyway. Still wanna see what Honda does also. Yamaha looks pretty unchanged.
My guess is, you'll see carry over GSXR's in all sizes on the webpage in February.

Kissing the mirror is CENSORED
Tony216 is offline  
post #34 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 06:34 AM
.....
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: usa
Age: 26
Posts: 5,454
Thanks: 3
Thanked 195 Times in 125 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
actually the gladius is still around. but it's strictly the "SFV650".... no "gladius" name anymore.
g34343greg is offline  
post #35 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 06:53 AM
Superbike Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midwest, USA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 3
Thanked 39 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furad View Post
Very few will ride high up in the rev range? Who do you know that doesn't dance around in the power band of any bike when their trying to have a good time? The CBR doesn't even have a power band up high because it's a thumper.

Watch this video of the CBR getting pulled on a race track from sheer power.
You kind of answered your own question by using race track footage to support your point. The fraction of 250's that get ridden "hard" is tiny globally. Most customers are commuting and learning on bikes in this segment. The ones that do, only get ridden like that one day a week, the rest of the time they're commuting. CBR's are selling very well.
Davidka is offline  
post #36 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 07:39 AM
Disgruntled Med Student
 
max384's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sugar Notch, PA (Northeast PA)
Age: 32
Posts: 8,150
Thanks: 3,583
Thanked 4,388 Times in 2,184 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidka View Post
You kind of answered your own question by using race track footage to support your point. The fraction of 250's that get ridden "hard" is tiny globally. Most customers are commuting and learning on bikes in this segment. The ones that do, only get ridden like that one day a week, the rest of the time they're commuting. CBR's are selling very well.
I don't know if you've ever ridden a 250 before, but I spent a year and almost 15,000 miles on one. I spent a LOT of time high in the rev range, including just commuting. Just doing the speed limit on the highway, you're fairly high up in the rev range. If you want to make a 'quick' pass you've got to downshift, and then you're solidly in the high rpm range. If I was out on a fun ride in the twisties, I was always high in the revs.

Here is a dyno chart from MotoUSA comparing the two bikes:



The Ninja takes over around 9k, which isn't all that high for these little bikes.
max384 is offline  
post #37 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 07:59 AM
CCS# 616
 
ZorroX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: S. Florida
Age: 24
Posts: 915
Thanks: 763
Thanked 306 Times in 172 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
The cbr pulls a little better out of corners, is lighter and handles a little better . The ninja pulls a little bit on the straight.


They are still pretty competive on the race track.

Last edited by ZorroX; 10-10-2012 at 08:02 AM.
ZorroX is offline  
post #38 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 08:47 AM Thread Starter
World Superbike Racer
 
acura9927's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 533
Thanks: 43
Thanked 60 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
The Ninja 300 is just too top end of the tach oriented for me. The dyno numbers smoke the Honda 250 in every way but on a butt dyno, I like my Honda more for the everyday stuff even normal freeway riding. There is just something about singles and twins and that fast torque hit that I enjoy more than a screamer.
acura9927 is offline  
post #39 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 09:24 AM
World Superbike Champion
 
oic0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Louisiana
Age: 31
Posts: 733
Thanks: 7
Thanked 150 Times in 106 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidka View Post
You kind of answered your own question by using race track footage to support your point. The fraction of 250's that get ridden "hard" is tiny globally. Most customers are commuting and learning on bikes in this segment. The ones that do, only get ridden like that one day a week, the rest of the time they're commuting. CBR's are selling very well.
On a 600 or 1000, you are breaking the law and blurring the scenery when you hit the peak horsepower. On a 250 you are passing, merging, getting out of the way, doing normal driving stuff. When I commute on my 250, I hit peak power dozens of times on my 20 minute commute, and find myself wishing it had more. If I had the honda that weighs 60lbs more and has 25% less power, that would suck lol.

Last edited by oic0; 10-10-2012 at 09:37 AM.
oic0 is offline  
post #40 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 12:45 PM
A guy on a scruffy bike
 
PhilB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Age: 52
Posts: 15,388
Thanks: 9,472
Thanked 3,765 Times in 1,830 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
  
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinwilly View Post
25% less power and like 10-15% more weight.


I have NO idea how they can justify this thing being 430 lbs. That's just silly. Like heavier than a 600 supersport. I get that they have to use less expensive materials to keep the cost where it needs to be... but 430 is NOT a lightweight bike. Which is really going to make it feel like a worse-handling 600 with crappy brakes and no power, instead of a super lightweight like the ninja 250 is.
The basic answer is that Honda is moving away from having specific models for each country and is trying to develop bikes they can sell in multiple markets. So this bike is intended not just as a beginner bike or second bike in the U.S., or just as a 500 sportbike, but also as a mid-to-upper level general transportation bike in third world countries, and as a commuter in the E.U., and to meet tiered licensing in some countries, etc. So it needs to be durable, and not too expensive to build, and to get good gas mileage, etc.

IOW, it isn't a supersport, and it would be silly to evaluate it strictly on those grounds. It's more of a sporty-styled UJM.

PhilB

"If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors. There is no other." -- Carl Schurz, (1829-1906) German born U.S. Senator and Union Army general during the US Civil War

"A free man must be able to endure it when his fellow men act and live otherwise than he considers proper." -- Ludwig von Mises

'93 Ducati "Ferrari of Motorcycles" Monster 900; 229,000 miles so far
PhilB is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to PhilB For This Useful Post:
Shamrock627 (10-10-2012)
post #41 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 05:43 PM
Supersport Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 186
Thanks: 3
Thanked 66 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
A little bit of a double standard going on in this thread I think. People are acting like the Ninja 300 is the best thing since sliced bread and the Honda CBR500 rumored specs are a pathetic half attempt at a budget bike?

First, look at the history. The Ninja 250 was launched in the eighties with 38 crank horsepower. The Ninja 300 is launching with 39 crank horsepower and several pounds heavier. Somehow that is progress?

I would bet anything that the CBR500 will make much more torque much lower then the Ninja 300 (which is claimed 27 lt-ft @ 10 grand), and will feel like a much faster bike in nearly any situation.

If you want more then 50 horsepower, just buy an FZ6R, Ninja 650R, SFV650, etc. etc. etc.

If you want a lighter bike, buy Ninja 300 or CBR250R.

This bike is filling the hole between those two categories, in power, price, and weight.
s1sport is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to s1sport For This Useful Post:
Kurt83 (10-11-2012), Shamefister (10-11-2012)
post #42 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 06:01 PM
Superbike Champion
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 357
Thanks: 13
Thanked 51 Times in 42 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I remember the first Honda 450 vertical twin (1967?); what a gorgeous looking engine! It had 42 hp back then with torsion bars instead of valve springs. With open pipes the dohc hemi head engine sounded really mean and racy.
-But really, if a 1000cc supersport can make 190hp then why can't a 500 twin make 90 hp in a chassis with a total wet weight around 380 lbs?
Wayne's Striple is offline  
post #43 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 06:20 PM
Supersport Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 186
Thanks: 3
Thanked 66 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne's Striple View Post
I remember the first Honda 450 vertical twin (1967?); what a gorgeous looking engine! It had 42 hp back then with torsion bars instead of valve springs. With open pipes the dohc hemi head engine sounded really mean and racy.
-But really, if a 1000cc supersport can make 190hp then why can't a 500 twin make 90 hp in a chassis with a total wet weight around 380 lbs?
I'm sure it's technically possible but there's a reason that a 1000cc supersport costs 15k. They use top shelf components, aluminum frames, carbon fiber, and have several million poured into the engine making it light weight and have higher power to weight.

Are you willing to spend 15k on a 500cc just for the lighter weight and half the horsepower of a liter?

This bike is not meant to be a super sports alternative, it was developed with economy and cost as primary focus.
s1sport is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to s1sport For This Useful Post:
PhilB (10-10-2012)
post #44 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 07:34 PM
500 G.P. Champion
 
Furad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Boise
Age: 35
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 83
Thanked 349 Times in 190 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by s1sport View Post
A little bit of a double standard going on in this thread I think. People are acting like the Ninja 300 is the best thing since sliced bread and the Honda CBR500 rumored specs are a pathetic half attempt at a budget bike?

First, look at the history. The Ninja 250 was launched in the eighties with 38 crank horsepower. The Ninja 300 is launching with 39 crank horsepower and several pounds heavier. Somehow that is progress?

I would bet anything that the CBR500 will make much more torque much lower then the Ninja 300 (which is claimed 27 lt-ft @ 10 grand), and will feel like a much faster bike in nearly any situation.

If you want more then 50 horsepower, just buy an FZ6R, Ninja 650R, SFV650, etc. etc. etc.

If you want a lighter bike, buy Ninja 300 or CBR250R.

This bike is filling the hole between those two categories, in power, price, and weight.


You got lost in this thread bud... We're comparing the CBR500 specs to the old Ninja 500.
Furad is offline  
post #45 of 75 (permalink) Old 10-10-2012, 09:09 PM
Supersport Racer
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 186
Thanks: 3
Thanked 66 Times in 40 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Furad View Post
You got lost in this thread bud... We're comparing the CBR500 specs to the old Ninja 500.
I didn't get lost in anything. The point was that every bike has gotten heavier and less powerful. The Ninja 300 is a bored out heavier version of the Ninja 250 and only makes 1 more HP compared to the original. The difference between a Ninja 500 and CBR500 is consistent with pretty much every other sub 10 grand "budget" motorcycle that has been developed over the last 10 years.

If you want a less power motorcycle you have options. If you want a more powerful motorcycle, you have options. If you want a budget sportbike which is something in between a CBR250R and a Ninja 650R, that's the niche the CBR500 is filling.
s1sport is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbikes.net forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reality Check acalliste Women Riders 31 11-01-2006 06:06 AM
Reality badgixxer Arizona 6 01-09-2006 08:09 PM
Anyone heard of a 1980 CBR500?? charmersfh Honda Sportbikes 1 07-24-2004 11:23 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome