New sport bikes vs. mid 90's sport bikes? - Sportbikes.net
General Sportbikes This area is for sport bike discussion in general. Topics that don't really belong anywhere else can go here. Questions can be answered and addressed to fully understand certain aspects of the sport. If your question is manufacturer specific please post it there.
Sponsored by: TCX Boots

User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 03:32 PM Thread Starter
Knows nothing
 
Electrodynamic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cornelius, NC
Age: 35
Posts: 155
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
New sport bikes vs. mid 90's sport bikes?

Bare with me guys.

I just got back from Barnes & Noble book store reading every European and US bike magazine I could find and I'm wondering just how good are the newer sport bikes vs. the older ones?

I've seen all the numbers, looked at all the figures, etc, and 1/4 mile and 0-60 times are soo low on sport bikes that it's almost like flipping a coin as far as which one would be faster given a normal rider on both bikes. Having said that, track times are another story. The newer'ish sport bikes are considerably faster around the track vs. the older ones (albeit same make, model, and cc). However, slightly modded 1999/2002'ish bikes are keeping up with their newer brothers.

Now I know my main question might be like asking is a 2000 Z28 Camaro just like a 1982 Z28, but the numbers are so close that I'm wondering just how good are the newer bikes? Do they turn in that much better, hold the turn that much better, etc?

I have only ridden my '95 F3 and my dad's '97 VFR 750 so I have no basis for comparing the newer 600's, 750's, 1k's vs. the older mid 90's sport bikes.

Can someone who has ridden the older sport bikes and the newer sport bikes give me a little insight as to how the newer bikes feel / perform vs. the older sport bikes?

PS: Flame on if you want.

Electrodynamic
Stereo Integrity
1995 CBR 600 - all white, no decals
"It was great, we were selling rich women their own fat a$$es back to them."
Electrodynamic is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 03:39 PM
World Superbike Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft Collins CO
Age: 35
Posts: 501
Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
check the overall weight ratio's of mid 90's sportbikes vs modern.. I think that has alot to do with it
2true is offline  
post #3 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 04:14 PM
Capo di tuti Capi
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 287
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
I also think the use of fuel injection vs. carbs is the big difference between them.

Stone

PS: I have a 1999 ZX-7R and I wouldn't trade its looks for any of the current bikes.

"A lie told often enough becomes the truth." - Vladimir Lenin

Member since 2001
Stonecoldchavez is offline  
post #4 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 04:38 PM
500 G.P. Champion
 
scotty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: minneapolis area
Age: 44
Posts: 1,252
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
yep- there is a difference. handlind, braking and accel. more diff the more ccs. for example compare a 95 zx11 to a busa. or a cbr900 to a new r1... big diff

Pilot of an 08`Concours. Riding in speed AND... AND comfort!
scotty is offline  
post #5 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 05:08 PM
Moderator
 
Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 38
Posts: 7,384
Thanks: 72
Thanked 43 Times in 35 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
 
One of the biggest differences I've noticed when comparing my old 96 6R to newer supersports is handling. The newer 600's suspensions are so much better that it's not even a comparison.

Motocross / Super Motard Forum Moderator

You start out motorcycling with a full bag of luck and an empty bag of experience. The trick is to fill the bag of experience before you empty the bag of luck.


Some people are like slinkies; they're good for nothing but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.
Jake is offline  
post #6 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 06:20 PM
World Superbike Racer
 
SlowCBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Westland, MI
Age: 32
Posts: 544
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake
One of the biggest differences I've noticed when comparing my old 96 6R to newer supersports is handling. The newer 600's suspensions are so much better that it's not even a comparison.
+1

The handling and suspension difference between my '93 F2 and '01 F4i was huge. The F4i inspired a lot more confidence and felt a lot more stable given the same roads and speeds. I was riding smoother and faster within the first few weeks of having the F4i, than I had been during 11k miles of riding the F2.

Then there is the whole fuel injection vs. carburetion thing, a smoother gearbox, a lighter clutch, more horsepower (a lot of this would be dependent on the condition of the older motor), wider wheels and tires (160 rear on the F2, 180 on the F4i), etc. Of course this is mainly comparing the F2 to the F4i, but it's a similar story with older and newer models of other bikes.

-Jon
'06 Honda CBR 1000 RR - FOR SALE
SlowCBR is offline  
post #7 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 06:24 PM
cheekybeast
 
cheekybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 26
Posts: 1,557
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
CBR f3's are sooo heavy. I've only ridden my f3, but i've sat on my friend's r6, and newer cbr's at the stealership, and the difference is incredible.
cheekybeast is offline  
post #8 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 08:38 PM
~ Master Technician ~
 
2001FZ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Indy
Age: 38
Posts: 2,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 33 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake
One of the biggest differences I've noticed when comparing my old 96 6R to newer supersports is handling. The newer 600's suspensions are so much better that it's not even a comparison.

You nailed it. For example. Look at the '98 ZX9R, it was the first bike to break into the 9s in the 1/4 mile. Today's liter bikes weight less and make 50 more horse yet can't go much quicker. However, they handle much, much better.

Currently riding a '05 GSXR 1000 ~ Full Tit. Akrapovic, PowerCommander, Schnitz Racing Custom map = 166horse. Suspension by Thermosman Suspension ~ Ohlins internals on forks, Hyperco rear spring
Need a better riding position? Check out www.convertibars.com. They are great!
Past bikes: '82 Yamaha Maxim 750, '89 Kaw. ZX7, '94 Kaw. ZX9R, '01 Yamaha FZ1, 04 Kaw. EX-250 ~ over 18 years & 120,000miles of riding experience.
2001FZ1 is offline  
post #9 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 09:01 PM
500 G.P. Champion
 
GreenZED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NJ
Age: 38
Posts: 1,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Right on jake. Forget about carbs vs FI, that doesnt make much difference stock for stock because a bank of 4 carburetors performs very similar to a bank of 4 FI throttle bodies...just one has more electronics. However, as said before the newer bikes have:

a) less weight
b) much better suspension

In fact, even if you upgrade the hell out of the suspension of older bikes they still wont outperform the stock suspension of most newer race reps. 2003 was a big year for sport bikes, anything 2003 and above is in a different level of performance.
GreenZED is offline  
post #10 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 11:33 PM
SBN Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 32
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by scotty
yep- there is a difference. handlind, braking and accel. more diff the more ccs. for example compare a 95 zx11 to a busa. or a cbr900 to a new r1... big diff
yup....the 900 is better
AppleJuice is offline  
post #11 of 11 (permalink) Old 04-08-2006, 11:40 PM
SBN Dictator Supreme
 
th12t33n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flint michigan
Age: 32
Posts: 985
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleJuice
yup....the 900 is better


th12t33n is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Sportbikes.net forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome