[636blurr]

Originally Posted by Lethal91

Ok can we hold up a minute here I am trying to understand something with everything posted here.

So we have a war against Iraq in the early 90's that we win but don't really go into Iraq and let Saddam stay in charge of that country?
Now this is what really gets me all confused in this letting Saddam stay in charge would have been like letting Hitler live and let him stay in charge of Germany after WW2.


Then we know about Bin laden and have tried to kill him a number of times but we don't for some reason or another?
And if we tried to kill him a number of times why didn't we kill him? If he was killed like we tried to then there would not have been a reason to invade Afgan.

Military-Industrial Complex Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961