Quote:
Originally Posted by baldheadeddork
Wait. Aren't you one of the Mensans who tried to defend Bush's excuses for going into Iraq?
You've got zero fucking room to laugh at anyone else's judgment.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Central Scrutinizer
What he ^ said.
Whatever happened to that old thread, anyway? That should be required reading for any other bush-shit eating fukwits like Davey here thinking of opening their slack-jawed yaps again.
|
As predictable as a colon blow dump after eating jalapenos, the bald headed dork and the Central Scrutinizer spew their vulgar condescending self-righteous rhetoric.
Yes, that's right I'm proud of the successes our brave troops have achieved by taking the War on Jihadhism to the heart of the Middle East.
What was the alternative to the War on Jihad? We saw how effective Bill Clinton's strategy was after the suicidal jihad attacks on America in the 90's (1993 World Trade Center bombing in NY, 1996 Khobar Towers bombing of US military barracks in Saudi Arabia, 1998 US Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, 2000 bombing of USS Cole in Yemen, etc culminating with the 9/11 attacks shortly after President Bush took office). Judging by the constant brazen escalation of the terrorist attacks, if President Bush hadn't taken the War on Jihad to the Middle East, their escalation on US soil would have continued to expand exponentially.