Quote:
Originally Posted by Parabellum
|
All very reputable sources.
And of course there is no one to refute those opinions, since any evidence of good intelligence couldn't be shared. And those getting that information wouldn't talk about it because it might endanger ongoing operations.
I'd like to see the definition of torture as well.
Obviously people think I'm in full support of torturing people for information. Not at all.
Good interrogators can get the majority of information without inflicting physical pain...the only prisoners I "assumed" (my fuck up for assuming) that everyone was thinking that way I Was....that you've got a prisoner who isn't telling you anything at all..but you have evidence to support that he / she has intelligence that could help..they just won't share it. Some are true fanatics....and most can be successfully interrogated without physical abuse...but there is mental torture as well.