View Single Post
Old 02-08-2008, 01:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
coronadozx
pimpin'
SBN Contributor
 
coronadozx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 26 13N 56 34E
Posts: 7,493
Casino Cash: $100
Sportbike: two: one green, the other blue
coronadozx has disabled reputation
Awards Showcase
Yellow Token: Yellow SBN Token - Issue reason:  
Total Awards: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goin Ape Nutz View Post
it depends on what your normal resting rate is. In general, you can find out the percentage of your max heart rate those are by subtracting your age from 220 and timesing that by whatever percentage you want to find (so... 220-32 x .70 for 70% and so forth).

The sensors on the machine are fairly accurate, but only measure a heart rate for 10 to 15 seconds and then do the math. Ok on most occasions, but if you have any sort of abnormal heart rythym or you skip a beat every now and then it could be off a bit. They are good for knowing where you are at in terms of work load and are much better than the burned calorie counters that base off your age and wieght and inputed work load.

It's a good medium you can always check it against your own count. Take a measurement on there, and then check your own pulse for a full minute.
i am of the opinion these monitors are not too accurate (at least my experience).

also, don't forget about the karvonen formula ...
__________________
"Our Country! In her intercourse with foreign nations may she always be in the right; but right or wrong, our country!" - Stephen Decatur (1779-1820)
coronadozx is offline   Reply With Quote