Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Czolgosz
Nah, the in your face stuff actually gets people riled up. If you're trying to make detrimental changes it must be incremental and below the radar. They don't want people up in arms (figuratively or literally).
|
Understandable, I could go either way with this: either a terrorist attack leading him to keep his power or the whole election set up to bring in whoever he wants next to follow his lead (below the radar)
Jinxr, of the two you suggested I'd agree more the the first one. I don't think something happening after the election is done will give the same results unless the person elected is killed in the event.